Archive for the ‘journals’ Category

Phoenix Art Museum and Francisco Corza’s “La Familia”

Posted Nov 8, 2008 at 3:37 pm, Mr. S

brochure

After dinner Friday night the six of us packed ourselves back into the car: John Krutsch, Marc Hugentobler, Scott Leslie, David Lloyd, Chris Lott, and myself (in the hatchback). On route I gorged myself on a conversation of writers and books with Chris and Scott, all the while cramped in the absolute rear of the car. When next I breathed fresh air we were at the Phoenix Art Museum, an excellent surprise courtesy Marc’s wise planning! Chris, Scott, and myself headed up to the European and American wings, where I made the following notes and observations (assisted by Chris and Scott’s own insight and experience):

  • The White RoseWilliam Merrit Chase’s vivid and sensual beauties, including The White Rose, where the woman seems to float above the ground on an eerily dark background. This portrait surprised Scott and I as it was nearly life-size, but done in pastel.
  • Picasso’s fearful symmetry.
  • Thomas Wilmer Dewey’s Iris.
  • Jean Baptiste Camillle-Carot’s Souvenir de Ville d’Avray.
  • Delpy grabs industry’s subtle invasion.
  • Pollice Verso

    Jean Leon Gerome’s famous Pollice Verso (Thumbs down), featuring a faceless, gold-masked gladiator victorious over his still-struggling opponent. Scott and I spent some time observing the differing classes in the audience and their responses to the scenario, which included bloodlust, pity, apathy, condescension, and horror. I noted the gold splendor in the hardness of metal of the victor contrasting with the softness of his now relaxed flesh. His opponent is not relaxed, however, yet his flesh remains pink and active compared to the still and observably gray skin of his fallen colleagues. Even the color of the metal armor of the victor against the fallen seems contrasting, from a clear and bright gold to a dulling and simple copper.

  • A Woman ReadingAntonio Rizzi captures sensuality and the frustrating and inescapable power of woman to control distance in A Woman Reading.
  • alps.jpgWhat is the story behind William Hamilton’s The Wolves Descending from the Alps? The comatose belle? The anthropomorphic lupines? The monstrous, feral expression of the hero? The purely frightened, entrapped horse? Does this refer to “Winter” from The Seasons by James Thomson?

Corzas’s La Familia

The most significant work for me in the museum was Francisco Corzas’s La Familia (1964).

la familia

Though this photograph doesn’t convey the strong sensation that the actual painting does, it can convey how this overtly spectral portrait of a family invokes ancestry and death. The family members all are translucent, suggesting their own transient state and invoking their interminable connections to the past. I made some guesses as to the roles of the family members:

  • la familiaIn the center is a father who has no pupils. His lips turn to teeth as one distances one’s self from the work. Scott suggested there may be a face emerging from his torso.
  • la familiaThe father’s role is central, but to the left is an elderly figure, a grandmother who looks on with wisdom and experience, perhaps even judgement.
  • la familiaTo the father’s right is a woman, probably the mother, who’s eyes look heavenward–an expression that struck me as being as helpless as it was hopeful.
  • la familiaThe child on the left is clearly frightened as the father’s hand rests on his shoulder. His small shape seems to grow larger at a distance, even gaining a halo. His figure is dark and brackish, and Chris suggested his expression and pose is like an evil cherub.
  • la familiaThe child on the right looks off the canvas, perhaps to the future. His bright colors suggest hope, yet the mule he rids on is braying, almost as if he senses the phantasmagoria that pervades the painting.
  • la familiaIndeed, with perhaps an exception for the father’s vacant eyes the mule most suggests death, as his snout quickly becomes skeletal.

The title La Familia describes those painted, but it also indicates the connection to life and death and ancestry that the family provides. But it also reminds me of the noun “familiar“, referring to an animal-like demon or spirit that accompanies one throughout one’s life, even serving as an assistant or an aid. Like such a familiar our family so imprints itself on our psyches that even when absent it is present, looking over our shoulders, scrutinizing, or praising, or wishing us the best.

Andy Chuka Linocuts

Posted Nov 8, 2008 at 12:40 pm, Mr. S

While in Phoenix, Arizona this week we stumbled upon a local Southwestern restaurant and were herded into a side room wherein I was struck by a series of achromatic linocuts that adorned the walls. I asked the proprietor who the artist was and he said they were Andy Chuka prints, but noted that though Chuka had been a Phoenix native there was no available information on his woodcuts to be found. The prints were irresistible, and so I snapped off some photos to archive here:

Chuka linocut

Chuka linocut

Chuka linocut

Chuka linocut

I spent some time this morning searching the web for info on Chuka and found nearly nothing that was verifiable. I began a stub on Wikipedia anyway until I can get to the library to continue the research. In the meantime, if anyone knows more about Andy Chuka or his works, please comment here.

CryptoJournal: Nov 2nd, 2008

Posted Nov 2, 2008 at 2:06 pm, Mr. S

Manic sleepless yesterday. Overdue books ignored. Fall back on Bogart, Burr, black and white (mostly grays). 4 forward. “Appreciated” “candor”. White shirt tucked away; black wool cardigan. Cold purged. Car lost color. Rain-drenched morning. A technical desert. Nameless girl in black skirt stepping in the puddles of mercurial silver. Move faster. Frantic wings blow cold winds,, freezing body and that which it secretes. Cold fingers frozen in ice from the neck down. Gnawing on something inedible. Purgatorio. Moshe. Namon. Full of stars. Opening of the moon. Turn to something nasty. Ovid. Bird of omen. Oval mug. Caffe Ibis. Thoth. Tet. “Tetty”. Translation. Terah. Trilogy.

Hope, Frightening and Evil

Posted Oct 10, 2008 at 12:11 am, Mr. S

Jame remarked to me the other day that hope is “a scary venture”, for it is escorted by memories of dissatisfactions and failures, and is a prelude to fearing both. At first I was curious about this fear, for I nearly always rely on hope to fuel my endeavors. But reflecting on the matter tonight (disclaimer: my brain may be mixed tonight by “Ulysses”, chai, and prescription opiates), I think she’s right, and to illustrate I return to my favorite Greek myth.

The tale of Pandora’s “Box” (in fact, a jar) has always fascinated me, though perhaps I never fully realized why. Jamie’s comment that hope is frightening rings true, for Pandora released from the jar all the evils of mankind except for one:

Only Hope remained there in an unbreakable home within under the rim of the great jar, and did not fly out at the door.
Hesiod, The Works and Days

pithos.jpg
A red-figure Attic pyxis showing a marriage procession: “the bride is driven in a chariot from her parent’s home to that of her husband. 440-430 BC” Wikimedia Commons. What figures might have adorned the jar Zeus gave to Pandora?

Rather than “hope”. I have also seen some interpret this final “evil” as the opposite: “foreboding”; for many consider hope not an evil but a good. Yet for many there is in hope itself an inextricable foreboding as Jamie described. In fact, the jar’s retention of hope may be seen as a necessity for survival: The absence of hope can numb us to the dull and tiresome tasks of existence, and I think in a way that makes ordinary life more bearable. But true hope is risk, and hope that demands rich, deep, meaningful satisfaction is not something our world of materialism is very good at satiating.

It makes sense, then, that our materialist’s society encourages superficiality and the immediate gratification of simple pleasures. Why? Perhaps the material powerbrokers in society find it the addictiveness a good way to keep us consuming and spending, reinvesting in their system while we trip ourselves up, binding ourselves an entraptive net from the silk they spin; they will keep us, they will drain us. But we accept and even choose these fixes with enthusiasm, perhaps because it’s the easiest way to keep our restless, questioning minds occupied, and far away from slipping into true hope, for true hope must for many of us trigger cynicism and pessimism in the vacuum where we wish for stronger, more lasting fulfillments.

What might those be? Attachment to our loved ones, persistence of life or being, and creation. I think one can find these in, respectively, family, spirituality/faith, and parenting/art (is it strange I mix those two?) ; but none of these are easy to package and sell, and as for making your own, they are works never completed, and collapse even as they are constructed.

collapsing new buildings
Back cover of Einstürzende Neubauten’s 1989 album Haus der Lüge

Teddy

Posted Sep 20, 2008 at 10:19 pm, Mr. S

Going back through old files I found this entry called, “Teddy”. Should have been dated sometime in Winter 2007 or 2008.

In line at the cafe at a local bookstore I found myself observing an old British lady and her middle-aged female companion. I think it was the novelty of her dialect and her turns of speech which captivated me at first. For instance, the way she asked for her “GI coffee”; I guessed it meant no sugar and cream, and as I listened to the young cashier question I found I was right. I smiled at the old lady as she looked up at me with her large dark eyes in her little old head, and she smiled back.

At the sugar counter as we added to our individual drinks she asked me, “Are you by yourself?”

“I am.”

“You may join us if you like.”

I averted my eyes and stirred my drink, pugilistic with myself. “I may do that,” I finally said on a dare.

And so I met “Teddy” (she never liked Edna) and her younger companion Elizabeth. I immediately thought of “Poopy” in Graham Greene’s “May We Borrow Your Husband” but thought I probably should not bring that up so early in a meeting out of fear that Teddy may be familiar with the story and its lascivious bits.

Teddy was delightful in talk, asking boundless questions about me, where I lived, where I worked, if I liked Orem.

“Orem is so much more friendly than Provo.”

“Really?” I asked, wondering if I had seen the difference.

“Yes, though I’m not sure why.”

Then Teddy asked me where I’d lived before Orem, and we agreed that my adopted hometown of Logan was extremely beautiful, and quiet, but too cold in the winter. This brought us to the subject of my schooling, for I had graduated from Utah State in Logan, and I related my experiences in China. Teddy asked how I liked the Chinese people and what I thought of them. I was incapable of making a single generalization, so I ended up making a series of small generalizations, and talking too much, and being very much aware of what I deemed to be a disapproving or skeptical look from behind Elizabeth’s thick glasses.

“It’s amazing how as a child one forms an image and develops an impression that stays with one for one’s whole life. I have always been very fond of the Chinese, for…”

…and Teddy explained how as a military child her father had been stationed in Jamaica, and she had gone to school with black children and some Chinese children as well, and how one day,

“…We were playing at the home of the Chinese ambassador, and the children said, ‘Oh, grandmother is coming, and she would like you to meet her.’

“In came this very regal Chinese woman, very small, you know, with tiny bound feet. And she wore the most gorgeous silk dress I had ever seen, with pearls and jewels which I had never seen. We had seashell necklaces, but never had I seen such beautiful clothes. I would have not been more impressed had I met the Queen, you know.

“And this Chinese grandmother, took me into her room–she did not speak English, no, nothing as silly as that, but she explained in Chinese–and of course the children translated for her–that her bed was very special, and that when she died she would be sent back to China on her bed, and given a proper Chinese burial in Chinese soil. This made such an impression on me that I have always been very fond of Chinese people.

“And you know the Nanking massacre as well. When that happened my heart went out to the Chinese, and for that reason I have always been averse to the Japanese for their butchery. Simply horrible.

“And the Death March as well. They were inhuman.”

I nodded solemnly, but in truth unreliable, and neither agreeing nor disagreeing, but retreating from forgotten or ignored history lessons.

“I say that, but I suppose we are all humans, and we all want the same things. I’m a Catholic, you know, and after The War we had German POWs in the town where I lived, not the fierce NAZIs , no, just the soldiers. And we allowed them to go to church with us in December, and I saw these soldiers lined up in the church, and I was full of hatred, I thought, ‘You evil men. If I could get my hands on you, I would peel each of your heads off, and knock them against the pews!’ In church! But then the service began, and the German soldiers all sang a German Christmas carol, what is that German Christmas carol?”

“Silent Night?” Elizabeth asked.

“Silent… No. Well, perhaps.”

“O Tannebaum”, I thought. “It’s Stille Nacht in German” I suggested.

“Yes, so it is. “Silent Night”. When they sang I heard how beautiful their voices were, and I wondered how people so evil could sing so lovely. And as they finished the song I saw that running down each of the soldiers’ cheeks were tears, and I knew they were thinking of their homes in Germany, and how Christmas might be celebrated there, and it made me think of the British boys held in Germany, and I wondered if they too were singing Silent Night together, and crying, hardened soldiers crying because it was Christmas, and they were far from home, and they could not help themselves.

“I must tell you it was this experience that made me understand that people are people no matter where you go, and it is for this reason that I believe very strongly that children should be mixed together as early as possible, not put in private schools and kept away from people with different backgrounds, seeing only other affluent children, and looking down their noses at everything that is not the same as they have learned it should be. People are not good or bad as a group, they are good or bad as individuals.”

Elizabeth and I agreed with this heartily. I aimed at explaining that was one thing that living in China had taught me: that there are a some true, indomitable human pleasures, desires, and comforts that do not depend upon wealth or modern conveniences, that only when we see real people in love, or angry, or sad in spite of having money or being poor do we recognize our commonalities. That was my aim, but I perambulated around the idea, and stumbled several times.

Teddy, however, was an conversational artist. “And another incident, when I was a young girl after the war nothing was ever delivered, and we had to carry everything from place to place, so I was bringing two bags of groceries home, big bags, one in each hand, and a German soldier came and did not speak English, but he motioned that I should walk and he would carry the bags for me to my house. So he took the bags and walked 3 feet behind me, and though I was 16 I was not a ravishing creature by any means, no I was very skinny at 16. But when we arrived home he handed me the bag, clicked his heels, and saluted me, and bowed, and so of course I bowed as well. And I learned from that that manners are very important, and people can get along so much better if we are simply polite to each other.

“Young man, you must learn from this to beware of old women, and never accept their invitations, or you will be trapped by their conversation, for old people need people to talk to more than the young, for we know we will die. And it is so nice to meet new people and hear different stories, and different aspects from different histories.”

I thought of how as a young person my social network is being added to, node upon node, and so many of my connections tend to be peers, and people of the same generation, for we are in the very lively, engaged, and ambitious phase of our life, and we must establish ourselves and our reputation; through this we extend our network and become known. But as one ruins toward the grave, one’s parents, one’s spouse, one’s friends and colleagues–each by each, node by node, they are annihilated, and it seems impossible to make new connections at the same pace as they are lost.

Making the connections must seem so much work, I thought, for in our pop culture of eternal youth and artificial deathlessness old people are the ultimate Other. I believe ageism is really more pervasive than sexism and racism combined, and so old people are avoided or ignored. I should be no one to talk, for I am probably no better, and am considered antisocial to boot.

But I could not articulate this, nor would I even try without risking the appearance of condescension. Then I was acutely aware of how much appearances meant to me, and that they were still significant to Elizabeth , but they were utterly meaningless to Teddy. Teddy had reached out to me, regardless of my youth, my appearance. And while it was clear that Elizabeth would have liked to have me challenged on some of the points or postures, Teddy accepted what I said openly and completely–even the meanings that came out wrong or were misspoken as I had striven to make my thinking known, Teddy listened to, nodded, and smiled.

“I find that the more people I meet, the more I find that despite our dissimilarities, we are much the same. ” She concluded. “The similarities we share are not only more numerous, they are vastly more important.”

Teddy had been fidgeting with her cup for some minutes now without drinking from it, and I knew it was empty. She glanced at my cup, long empty, and knew it was a good time to end.

“I’ve quite enjoyed our conversation.” Teddy said. “But I really must get Elizabeth back to her home and her children.”

We thanked each other politely, and she commended me on my manners. It is difficult for me to socialize, and so I felt I deserved her commendation; I denied it all the same, thinking that too would be seen as polite. Moments later they had disappeared, and I was again untied to set to drift without oars, to write, or think, or read, and not converse.

The Club Which Does Not Exist

Posted Sep 17, 2008 at 10:27 am, Mr. S

MCIFW: Characterization

Posted Sep 14, 2008 at 11:41 am, Mr. S

Going back through Adam Sexton’s Master Class in Fiction Writing (MCIFW) I continue my long review of the book by posting this summary and commentary on Chapter 2 Characterization: Sense and Sensibility.

Sexton begins ch 2 by bridging the storyline path to the topic of characterization by asserting that proper storyline conflicts provide and allow for deeper characterization. “…character drives plot, and vice versa.” But it is true that while storyline provides structure and interest, characters make it meaningful; in fact, many stories that we are familiar with are memorable as much through their characters as by their plot.

The literary case study for this topic is Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. Sexton first notes a few aspects of it’s storyline: though the novel relies on exposition (initiating the story with it–a risk, perhaps), Austen follows exposition with specific scenes (involving dialogue, not much description or action). Sense and Sensibility also employs rather passive protagonists, a curiosity which Sexton urges modern writers to resist.

Tertiary and Secondary Characters

Though there are many characters in this novel Austen brings them in “relatively gradually”, and rarely has multiple characters active in the same scene. “Storytelling”, Sexton writes, “is by definition undemocratic.” Not all characters should receive (nor deserve) equal time on the page. Concern with the protagonist consumes most of the characterization. “Tertiary, or third-level, characters are not especially distinguishable from the furniture, nor should they be. Tertiary characters do exactly what’s expected of them…and no more.” Though these characters are what E.M. Forster would call “flat”–they are consistent and predictable. This is not a criticism, Sexton tells us. In order to preserve character arc with our protagonist, and to continue the storyline in a manner that maintains interest and coherence. Writers need flat characters to do what they do, then get out of the way.

Continuing Forster’s description of “flat” characters we can see that secondary characters are “round”. Forster writes:

“The test of a round character is whether it is capable of surprising in a convincing way.”

We must beware of “blandly heroic” heroes (flat) or surprisingly heroic characters “with absolutely no prior indication that they were capable of doing so (falsely round).” Surprise then convince.

Primary Characters

Primary characters must be round to be effective. They’re probably imperfect–in fact some of the best protagonists are protagonists because they are deeply flawed–but they are convincingly so, and it may be due to their overcoming, working around, or giving into these imperfections as they respond to the conflicts of the storyline that they surprise the reader. In addition to being round, however, “the fourth dimension of characterization is motivation. Writers would do well to understand the (usually several) factors that motivate their primary characters, and while the writer should avoid articulating these explicitly, the motivations should be apparent to the reader through a mixture of scenes and exposition.

Character Dossiers

Sexton recommends that writers create a “dossier” for each character that are hoped to be three-dimensional. This is an activity recommended by many writing instructors, and is mirrored in Step 3 of Randy Ingermanson’s Snowflake method. I paraphrase Sexton’s question points as follows:

  • Demographics (name, sex, political affiliation, education)
  • Acquaintances
  • Habits, interests, failures
  • Emotional response triggers (happy, sad, angry, love, hate)
  • Secrets (ambitions, mistakes, or truths)
  • Singular desire as the essence of the character’s current state

Probably the best, most incisive part of this chapter is Sexton’s four ways of characterizing (with my comments):

  1. “What the character does” In response to which I quote the Bible, “You will know them by their fruit. Grapes aren’t gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles…” Matthew 7:16. Sexton suggests this is the best method of characterization.
  2. “What the character says (or thinks, if we have access to his thoughts) about himself.” My emphasis on about himself, however accurate or inaccurate this may be. This provides keen possibilities to flip surprise and believability on their heads.
  3. “What others say (or think) about the character.” Again, this can be accurate or inaccurate, thereby revealing subtle traits of the target and the teller.
  4. “What the narrator tells us about the character.” Sexton suggests this is the second-best method. I ask, Do we trust the narrator? Usually; in these cases the narrator’s authority may rival #1, cutting through the inaccuracies of words spoken about the character. Are there instances where we don’t trust the narrator? Yes, and let the games begin.

Characters in Contrast

Sexton continues that one can characterize by contrast, matching or obversing one character from another, e.g. how different characters respond the the same conflict or situation.

Metamorphoses

The final matter of characterization is metamorphoses. How do the primary characters grow or change in response to the conflicts? (From studying Shakespeare I would add, If they don’t what are the consequences of that failure to grow or change?) Character change in response to conflict can deliver reader satisfaction at the denouement; the story’s conflicts and outcomes become meaningful.

“Crisis reveals character.”

MCIFW: Introduction & Story Structure, “Araby”

Posted Aug 29, 2008 at 8:14 am, Mr. S

Some mornings I can’t bring myself to work on the project at hand, but rather than wasting that time on inconsequential tasks I can at least write on writing. In this instance I’ll post a few summaries and comments on Adam Sexton’s Master Class in Fiction Writing (MCIFW).

The introduction posits that writing is like any craft or skill; not only can it be taught, it must be taught. The question “how?” is answered with some of the best examples in the English language, ones which demonstrate the standard battery of writing skills:

  • story structure
  • characterization
  • plot
  • description
  • dialogue
  • point of view
  • style, voice

Sexton suggests that one visit an art museum with a painter (as opposed to a historian or critic) and note how s/he looks at paintings for information and experience, learning from a wide variety of styles and techniques.

Chapter 1, “Story Structure: ‘Araby’” looks at the short story as defined by some of the most gifted writers in the English language. Whereas Lou Reed says, “But you can’t be Shakespeare and you can’t be Joyce / So what is left instead?” (Magic and Loss: The Summation) Sexton suggests that being gifted goes a long way, but otherwise you can write a story that looks like a story. While stories often feature a protagonist and an antagonist the good ones always focus on the main character’s needs.

And so we examine James Joyce’s short story “Araby” as a model for the structure of a short story, one in which the protagonist’s conflict may “be relatively trivial, as long as he needs it sincerely, needs it badly“(5). As an element of the short story’s structure, it is this that draws the reader into the story. Without stating it, Sexton implies that a story that does not intrigue and satisfy a reader is a story that has failed. I think Ray Bradbury would agree with this sentiment–regardless of what your story is saying it must be constructed in a way that is compelling.

Rather than examining what the work stands for or signifies, Sexton turns us to look at the structure: the consciously chosen title, how the opening scene draws us in and convinces us of the world being portrayed by delivering not to our intellect through exposition but to our senses through drama, and “unbalances us” before delivering the story in a mixture of the dramatic and the expository. The conflict in “Araby” is the boy’s crush on the girl, and his promise that “If I go… I will bring you something”. But as literary critics know this can be expanded to mean far more than the surface provides (religious conflict, maturation, etc) via subtext.

Sexton points out that the activating incident in “Araby” comes quickly, convincing the reader to keep reading, and that development occurs as “forces of antagonism” build not only tension but reader-involvement and commitment to our protagonist. And while in some stories the climax comes with finality (”Reader, I married him.”–Jane Eyre) or an explosive mano e mano, “Araby”’s climax is simply a resolution, even if that resolution is failure. The consequences of that resolution lies in the denouement, the “unraveling”–the part where the write can say, definitively, “The End”. “Araby”, Sexton suggests, is weak in this final feature.

Paul Ferny’s Paintings

Posted Jul 8, 2008 at 5:57 pm, Mr. S

OR, Casual LinkedIn Connection Leads to Disturbances of Awe and Envy

Ah, the joys and perils of LinkedIn.com. Today I happened to connect with former Logan High School classmate Mike Stocker. Mike and I weren’t ever more than acquaintances, but no matter—LinkedIn and similar Facebook-esque sites are as much about quantity as they are about quality of connections. Glancing through Mike’s connections I spotted another familiar name: Paul Ferny. Whereas Mike and I had been mere acquaintances Paul and I politely ignored each other. Part of this I recall was a bit of jr. high rivalry—at least on my part: I had wanted to be a graphic designer at the time, and Paul was arguably the best artist in the school, being particularly apt at caricatures.

Even so, when I hit Paul’s gallery of oil paintings I was astounded at the stirring and toothsome works featured therein. The blazing power and range of Paul’s work testify to his labors, appropriately shaming those of us who have fallen short of the dream.

A few favorites from Paul Ferny’s online galleries

Stealing or Revealing

Posted Jul 5, 2008 at 8:05 pm, Mr. S

Today I was writing the character sketch of the last primary character in the novel I’m trying hard to finish, and found myself quoting word-for-word what is probably the most famous line in any Star Trek film:

The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

I include this trivia to evidence the fact that it’s hard to write anything without what Harold Bloom calls the anxiety of influence playing a role. For instance, nearly every time I reflect of the storyline of the early stages of my novel I say something like a little prayer: “Please let this not be like Harry Potter”, even though the two have absolutely nothing in common. Indeed, the sentiment is as much about my distaste (not, however, disrespect) for Rowling’s writing as it is about fears of attribution and appropriation. But even Rowling’s Potter series is based on everything from Star Wars to The Lord of the Rings to (perhaps most obnoxiously) Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game.

Cognizant of this, I’ve decided that rather than ignore the similarities between my effort and the successful efforts of others, I need to recognize them and focus on how mine is different, or on how my telling of (parts of) the same story needs to be told in it’s own particular way. One should only write the books that can’t not be written, and so all scrutiny to similarities should be acknowledged and considered.